<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building Trust &#8211; in self publishing companies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://selfpublishingtoday.com/2009/06/23/building-trust-in-self-publishing-companies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://selfpublishingtoday.com/2009/06/23/building-trust-in-self-publishing-companies/</link>
	<description>The state of the self-publishing industry... today...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 02:09:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leticia</title>
		<link>http://selfpublishingtoday.com/2009/06/23/building-trust-in-self-publishing-companies/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leticia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selfpublishingtoday.com/?p=279#comment-135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, I agree - good posting.

Many authors, given the rise of new technologies, seem to find themselves faced with the Lulus of the world, or traditional publishers. The problem with sites like Lulu (and others that are similar) is that you can never get a solid answer out of them about things like process - or even materials.

As an eco-conscious writer and publisher myself, I initiated a series of queries about the source of paper, and got a lot of &quot;we don&#039;t know&quot; type answers.

So, while authors want their babies taken care of, in some respects the circular queries tend to suggest that self-publishing with a company or business you can meet and grow a relationship might work better. You get the chance to be a real part of the process, and have far more negotiation power (not to mention the education you get along the way!) than you do with a faceless &quot;company&quot;.

Sorry this is so long - just my two cents :P

cheers
Leticia]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree &#8211; good posting.</p>
<p>Many authors, given the rise of new technologies, seem to find themselves faced with the Lulus of the world, or traditional publishers. The problem with sites like Lulu (and others that are similar) is that you can never get a solid answer out of them about things like process &#8211; or even materials.</p>
<p>As an eco-conscious writer and publisher myself, I initiated a series of queries about the source of paper, and got a lot of &#8220;we don&#8217;t know&#8221; type answers.</p>
<p>So, while authors want their babies taken care of, in some respects the circular queries tend to suggest that self-publishing with a company or business you can meet and grow a relationship might work better. You get the chance to be a real part of the process, and have far more negotiation power (not to mention the education you get along the way!) than you do with a faceless &#8220;company&#8221;.</p>
<p>Sorry this is so long &#8211; just my two cents <img src='http://s2.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>cheers<br />
Leticia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie Malonson</title>
		<link>http://selfpublishingtoday.com/2009/06/23/building-trust-in-self-publishing-companies/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernie Malonson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selfpublishingtoday.com/?p=279#comment-133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ray, nice post. I think too many authors and new publishers get so emotionally attached to getting in print that they lose sight of the fact that publishing is a business.

Yes, you want your baby taken care of, while at the same time, you are often charged for things that you might be better off taking care of yourself.

Cheers!

Bernie]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray, nice post. I think too many authors and new publishers get so emotionally attached to getting in print that they lose sight of the fact that publishing is a business.</p>
<p>Yes, you want your baby taken care of, while at the same time, you are often charged for things that you might be better off taking care of yourself.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
<p>Bernie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

