New York Times article ‘Self-Publishers Flourish as Writers Pay the Tab’

A great article on the state of the self-publishing industry appeared in the New York Times on Wednesday that described the growth and health of the industry in comparison to the more traditional world of publishing. This article is of interest for a number of reasons – not the least of which is the open discussion of the self publishing world by a paper located in the bastion of the traditional publishing world – New York.

The article makes a number of points – but primarily discusses the huge growth in title count that self publishing has created. It goes on to note that most books that are self-published sell very few copies. But… it’s got some other interesting nuggets that bear commentary:

“As traditional publishers look to prune their booklists and rely increasingly on blockbuster best sellers, self-publishing companies are ramping up their title counts…”

- this truly is the raison d’etre for self publishing and any sort of success that it may generate. Self published books are typically most successful when the target market is NOT ‘everyone’. Focused, quality, niche-oriented titles are the products most likely to have success. How’s your book marketing plan coming along?

“The trend is also driven by professionals who want to use a book as an enhanced business card (the link jumps to an article on the Dog Ear Publishing site that talks about books as business cards) as well as by people who are creating books as gifts for family and friends.”

- in many industries, the trend seems to be ‘if you aren’t the guy who wrote the book… well, then you aren’t they guy…‘ (or gal for that matter). Professionals who stand out in their industry often write books – and in days past, they were the experts that the traditional academic or professional publishers chose to write lengthy tomes on specific topics. With professional book sales in the dumpster, very few professional publishing groups are adding much in the way of content. In comes self-publishing – the upside being that professionals can now publish their own books, in their own way, and receive all the credit and profit. The downside is still the one ‘downside’ of self publishing – anyone  can publish a book and call themselves a ‘professional’ or ‘expert’.

“Still, many self-publishing companies allow authors to take more than the traditional royalty of 15 percent of the cover price on hardcovers and 10 percent or less on paperbacks.”

- the profit / royalty question – how much should an author make from their self-published book? How does the self publishing company make a profit? Who should get what? This is a tough question – and one often overlooked by authors interested in self publishing. My position is this: a self published author should get ALL the profit from sales – the company publishing (or printing -in the case of Lulu, Blurb, Createspace; all of whom are printers, not really publishers) should charge a single flat fee for each sale. Usually it’s ties into or part of a ‘print charge’ for each book. Royalties, in the traditional world, are a percentage of the sale -mostly this is done because the publisher has a higher risk in a book with a higher retail. In theory, a book that has a retail of $90 (like a textbook or professional reference) had a much higher cost to produce (design, editing, development, production, etc) than a $7.99 paperback. So – the royalty ‘rewarded’ the publisher for that risk as the retail price grew. No self publishing company has ANY risk in a self published title – they’ve all been paid for their services upfront. The only cost to a self publisher is the printing – and it’s the exact same for 150 page (or fill-in-your-page-count-here) paperback whether the retail price is $7.99 or $79.99.

“Louise Burke, publisher of Pocket Books, said publishers now trawl for new material by looking at reader comments about self-published books sold online. Self-publishing, she said, is “no longer a dirty word.””

- Well, now… what do you know. This does raise the importance of getting your readers to add reviews to your Amazon.com page.

Self publishing may no longer be a dirty word – but it’s also beginning to become a significant (albeit small yet) part of the bookselling world.

Is publishing ‘recession-proof’? How about self publishing?

“American Adults Reading More Literature” is the heading of a recent article in Book Business (a web site dedicated to the business of, well, books…) about a report produced by the National Endowment for the Arts that shows readership among American adults grew significantly since 2002. The time frame (6 years) seems to be rather broad – and ‘literary reading’ as defined by the NEA is “the reading of any novels, short stories, poems, or plays in print or online.”

In the past, the publishing industry has been very counter-cyclical… when times got tough, Americans got reading (and not spending money on other pursuits). I don’t know if we can see that same trend these days – and I wonder what self-publishing might have to do with the increase in readership (if anything?) It’s hard to imagine that someone interested in publishing a book wouldn’t be a reader. Surprisingly it was ‘younger readers’ (18 to 24) that showed the greatest growth in reading – just what are these kids reading?

The stats and report (called Reading On The Rise) are available for no charge as a download from the NEA site.

Here’s a brief outline from the Book Business site of the most salient points, with my commentary:

• The absolute number of literary readers has grown significantly. There were 16.6 million more adult readers of literature in 2008. The growth in new readers reflects higher adult reading rates combined with overall population growth.

– this growth puts the total number of ‘reading adults’ now at nearly 113 million – an amazing number if you think about it…

• Young adults show the most rapid increases in literary reading. Since 2002, 18- to 24-year-olds have seen the biggest increase (nine percent) in literary reading, and the most rapid rate of increase (21 percent). This jump reversed a 20-percent rate of decline in the 2002 survey, the steepest rate of decline since the NEA survey began.

– stunning considering the incredible prevalence of ‘digital’ media that is in no way ‘literary’ – things like blogs, news, and other items were excluded from the survey.

• For the first time in the survey’s history, literary reading has increased among both men and women. Literary reading rates have grown or held steady for adults of all education levels.

– women still made up the bulk of readers (58% to 42%)

• Fiction (novels and short stories) accounts for the new growth in adult literary readers; reading poetry and drama continues to decline, especially poetry-reading among women.

– poetry and plays saw a 31% and 28% decline respectively. Poetry has always been a tough market…

• Online readers also report reading books. Eighty-four percent of adults who read literature (fiction, poetry or drama) on or downloaded from the Internet also read books, whether print or online.

– this is the good news for those of us who utilize the more ‘traditional’ method of print to deliver our content. It should also encourage authors who are NOT utilizing e-book / Kindle / Mobi / whatever to deliver content to jump in and experiment.

• Nearly 15 percent of all U.S. adults read literature online in 2008.

– see comment above – the report doesn’t identify what sort of literature – but that number represents almost 34 MILLION adults…

Check out the report – it’s some much-needed good news for all of us interested in all forms of book publishing.

Internet Marketing – is ANYTHING too far?

I’ve been absent from the blog for ages – since November 3 to be exact – and it took a SEO expert taking a swipe at my Google AdWords approach to get me writing again… Go figure… I’d also said that this blog wouldn’t be a forum just to promote Dog Ear Publishing, but a place to provide concrete facts and strategies for self published authors.

Brian Pasch – the brains and brawn behind SEO company Pasch Consulting Group – has been  hired by a competitor of Dog Ear Publishing named Tate Publishing. Dog Ear runs very agressive Google AdWords campaigns on all of our competitors – including Tate Publishing. In short, our ‘ad’ on Google says “Don’t Use Tate Publishing” 0r “Don’t Use This Publisher” – followed by “Until you read this review of their costs and services.” The ads then link to a page on the Dog Ear site that compares the publisher, using data from the publishers site, to Dog Ear. Topics covered are contract, costs, book printing prices, author profit and many others.

Is this sort of Google Adwords ad going too far? I don’t think so – I believe every author should stop and read the comparisons. And not just because I think Dog Ear is better – but because we draw attention to some of the most challenging weaknesses in the self publishing industry. We don’t claim to be the publisher for everyone – and even show circumstances where Dog Ear is probably NOT the best choice – but we do claim to be one of the only ones willing to show authors the truth. And – we encourage every author to completely research their chose self publishing companies – don’t rely on our data. Its a part of the reason we put our data on our site – in plain sight – so that you may conduct your research without feeling pressured by a sales person on the phone.

Want to find out more? You can find Brian Pasch’s comments here - commenting on a post Joe Wikert wrote about Dog Ear Publishing – and here on his blog.

He (Brian) raises interesting points, even though he is employed by Tate Publishing to help raise their presence on the web. The online world is always struggling to come-of-age – but it’s still a Wild-West sort of place where anyone (especially self-publishing companies) can make any unfounded claim about how great their service offerings happen to be… Usually without getting called out for their false statements – I believe that ‘in-your-face’ marketing may appear on the surface to be unpleasant – but what about when it truly makes you a better consumer by providing information not found anywhere else? Is it then worth the ‘detour’ it took you on to make you a smarter consumer?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 340 other followers